The European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences
Online ISSN: 2301-2218
European Publisher
The Implementation of Massive Open Online courses into Educational Processes at Russian Universities
Table 1: Criteria for the peer assessment
| 1. Word Count | ||
| Unsatisfactory | 200-300 | 2 |
| Satisfactory | 300-400 | 3 |
| Good | 400-500 | 4 |
| Excellent | 500 and more | 5 |
| 2. Structure | ||
| Unsatisfactory | There is no structure | 0 |
| Satisfactory | Introduction Main body - Conclusion | 2 |
| Good | Introduction Main body 1. showing the deep understanding of the topic; 2. examples - Conclusion | 4 |
| Excellent | Introduction Main body 1. showing the deep understanding of the topic; 2. using: active vocabulary;3. examples - Conclusion | 5 |
| 3. Relevance to the topic | ||
| Unsatisfactory | It is clear that the author is not acquainted with the topic and the under study materials | 0 |
| Satisfactory | It is hard to tell if the author understands the topic and the under study materials | 2 |
| Good | The author is acquainted with the topic and the under study materials | 4 |
| Excellent | The author fully understands the topic. It is clear that he/she digested the under study materials and has his/her own opinion | 5 |
| 4. Examples | ||
| Unsatisfactory | There are no examples | 0 |
| Satisfactory | There is only one example | 3 |
| Good | There are only examples from the materials under study (Ted talk, the film, the individually read articles) or/and from the author’s own experience | 4 |
| Excellent | The author provides the reader with examples from his/her own experience, mass media, literature etc. and also from the materials under study (Ted talk, the film, the individually read articles) | 5 |
| 5. Decide whether the essay inspires a further discussion | ||
| Unsatisfactory | There is no reasoning in the essay and it is hard to understand the author’s idea | 0 |
| Satisfactory | The reasoning repeats the under study materials and doesn’t inspire a further discussion | 2 |
| Good | The reasoning repeats the under study materials but inspires a further discussion | 4 |
| Excellent | The author’s reasoning is interesting and creative. The essay inspires a further discussion | 5 |